Fenway Erupts in Boos: Healey & Wu Get a Brutal, Well-Deserved Reception on...
Don't Back a Florida Man (or Woman) Into a Corner—And Don't Commit Crime...
TIME Mag Review of Springsteen's HISTORIC 'Resistance' Concert Couldn't Possibly Be More O...
HuffPost's Attempt to Create a Good Friday Outrage Cycle About Pete Hegseth Is...
Ozempic (Allegedly) Gov. Celebrates National Walking Day While Chicago Mourns Teen Shot De...
Deportation? We Don't Do That: Illegals Squat for Decades, Their 'American' Kids Try...
DNC Stomps on Multiple Rakes in Rush to Slam Trump Over 'Affordable' Health...
Let's Check on How Many Network Evening Newscasts Mentioned the Fraud Arrests in...
Endorsed! Corrupt Clintonista Marc Elias Accidentally Makes the Best Case Ever for Harmeet...
Here's How CBS News Reported $4 Gas Under Biden vs. Trump
Vindman Outrage is the Ultimate Endorsement: Hegseth Rightly Boots Army Chief Gen. George
Newsom Press Office Follows Up 'President With a Brain' Post With Even More...
Make Military Bases Great Again: Pete Hegseth Restores God-Given 2A Rights to Servicemembe...
Thanksgiving, Rockets, and Saving the World: Libs Meltdown Over American Greatness — Cry...
Houston Calls Good Friday the 'Spring Holiday Weekend' – Because Saying 'Easter' Is...

Reuters Says 2023 Is The Warmest In 125,000 Years

Someone should do a welfare check on Greta Thunberg. Reuters reports 2023 will be the hottest year in, well, a very long time:

Advertisement

We've been keeping track of temperatures since about 1880, and the local weatherman can't predict tomorrow's weather, but we're supposed to just trust them on this.

Twitter/X had thoughts:

So hot.

Yeah, they're burying the lede here: so the world was warmer 125,000 years ago when people ate bugs, didn't drive cars, didn't have electricity or gas stoves, and lived in caves? Maybe our SUVs and hamburgers aren't the problem.

Thanks, Ogg.

Whoops.

So much hotter.

Advertisement

But the earth has a fever! Or something.

Those of us who hate the cold agree.

The tweet continues (emphasis original):

there are no detailed temperature records extending back 100,000 years, so we don't know for sure."

'We don't know for sure', but they're sure going to act like they do.

Always. If it was static, that's when we should start to panic.

Advertisement

No, it doesn't, so it gets ignored.

Of course. There's an agenda here.

The question we always ask the environmental Left is this: what should the temperature be? What is the 'correct' temperature? And, as of now, we haven't gotten an answer. Just that things are 'too warm' or 'too cold' or 'too extreme.' Can't imagine why they can't answer this question.

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement