NATO Ratio: Flubbed NYT Iran War Headline Creates Groundswell of Acronym Acrimony Online
Google Is Free: X BODIES Obama-Era Diplomat For Asking and (Wrongly) Answering His...
Biden Walks Through an Airport: Case Closed, He Was Never Senile, You Conspiracy...
Fenway Erupts in Boos: Healey & Wu Get a Brutal, Well-Deserved Reception on...
Don't Back a Florida Man (or Woman) Into a Corner—And Don't Commit Crime...
TIME Mag Review of Springsteen's HISTORIC 'Resistance' Concert Couldn't Possibly Be More O...
HuffPost's Attempt to Create a Good Friday Outrage Cycle About Pete Hegseth Is...
Ozempic (Allegedly) Gov. Celebrates National Walking Day While Chicago Mourns Teen Shot De...
Deportation? We Don't Do That: Illegals Squat for Decades, Their 'American' Kids Try...
DNC Stomps on Multiple Rakes in Rush to Slam Trump Over 'Affordable' Health...
Let's Check on How Many Network Evening Newscasts Mentioned the Fraud Arrests in...
Endorsed! Corrupt Clintonista Marc Elias Accidentally Makes the Best Case Ever for Harmeet...
Here's How CBS News Reported $4 Gas Under Biden vs. Trump
Vindman Outrage is the Ultimate Endorsement: Hegseth Rightly Boots Army Chief Gen. George
Newsom Press Office Follows Up 'President With a Brain' Post With Even More...

LA Times gives readers the chance to rewrite the Second Amendment; WaPo offers 'fix'

The media certainly can kick into advocacy mode quickly when it feels like the topic warrants it. Every since the left decided there was a little too much “hate speech” in free speech, papers have been hosting op-eds and hot takes on the First Amendment and how maybe being so “absolutist” about free speech really isn’t such a good idea after all.

Advertisement

Remember this?

https://twitter.com/CounterMoonbat/status/900073447715418113

Of course, the media has never had a problem questioning the Second Amendment or the founders’ “true” intentions, so it’s no surprise to see newspapers hauling out the same old arguments on the right to bear arms following the mass shooting in Las Vegas. Cameron Gray noticed a couple of takes Tuesday:

The Washington Post’s argument really is an old one; it was published in 2014, but the Post decided to tweet a fresh link to it Tuesday.

The Los Angeles Times, on the other hand, decided to grant its readers some wish fulfillment and had them rewrite the amendment; hence, takes such as, “The right of the people to own firearms shall be balanced and regulated to ensure the safety of fellow citizens,” and, “AMENDMENT II. Repealed.”

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/SixedEighty/status/915382100035080193

https://twitter.com/FactSoup0001/status/915364662526570502

* * *

Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos