NATO Ratio: Flubbed NYT Iran War Headline Creates Groundswell of Acronym Acrimony Online
Google Is Free: X BODIES Obama-Era Diplomat For Asking and (Wrongly) Answering His...
Biden Walks Through an Airport: Case Closed, He Was Never Senile, You Conspiracy...
Fenway Erupts in Boos: Healey & Wu Get a Brutal, Well-Deserved Reception on...
Don't Back a Florida Man (or Woman) Into a Corner—And Don't Commit Crime...
TIME Mag Review of Springsteen's HISTORIC 'Resistance' Concert Couldn't Possibly Be More O...
HuffPost's Attempt to Create a Good Friday Outrage Cycle About Pete Hegseth Is...
Ozempic (Allegedly) Gov. Celebrates National Walking Day While Chicago Mourns Teen Shot De...
Deportation? We Don't Do That: Illegals Squat for Decades, Their 'American' Kids Try...
DNC Stomps on Multiple Rakes in Rush to Slam Trump Over 'Affordable' Health...
Let's Check on How Many Network Evening Newscasts Mentioned the Fraud Arrests in...
Endorsed! Corrupt Clintonista Marc Elias Accidentally Makes the Best Case Ever for Harmeet...
Here's How CBS News Reported $4 Gas Under Biden vs. Trump
Vindman Outrage is the Ultimate Endorsement: Hegseth Rightly Boots Army Chief Gen. George
Newsom Press Office Follows Up 'President With a Brain' Post With Even More...

How feminist: Emergency contraception ad pits babies against shoes and lipstick

This ad for free emergency contraception comes to us from Great Britain’s National Health Service, and it caught the eye of Michael Davis, U.S. editor of the Catholic Herald, among others.

Advertisement

Yes … what sane woman would ever want a baby when she could be spending the money on shoes and makeup?

We get what they were going for, but Davis is absolutely right: the ad treats babies as obstacles to self-gratification; because, of course, mothers could never afford both shoes and a baby. Babies ruin everything that way.

But women love shoes. Who would trade shoes for a beautiful baby?

Advertisement

Oh, it’s real. There’s even a piece in today’s Daily Mail about a commuter blasting the ad for being sexist: “The fact that it went through so many people before being displayed is another thing that made me so mad. The person who designed it, signed it off, printed it and distributed it. Did nobody stop and think ‘are we really going ahead with this?'”

Advertisement

On the other hand …


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos