TIME Mag Review of Springsteen's HISTORIC 'Resistance' Concert Couldn't Possibly Be More O...
HuffPost's Attempt to Create a Good Friday Outrage Cycle About Pete Hegseth Is...
Ozempic (Allegedly) Gov. Celebrates National Walking Day While Chicago Mourns Teen Shot De...
Deportation? We Don't Do That: Illegals Squat for Decades, Their 'American' Kids Try...
DNC Stomps on Multiple Rakes in Rush to Slam Trump Over 'Affordable' Health...
Let's Check on How Many Network Evening Newscasts Mentioned the Fraud Arrests in...
Endorsed! Corrupt Clintonista Marc Elias Accidentally Makes the Best Case Ever for Harmeet...
Here's How CBS News Reported $4 Gas Under Biden vs. Trump
Vindman Outrage is the Ultimate Endorsement: Hegseth Rightly Boots Army Chief Gen. George
Newsom Press Office Follows Up 'President With a Brain' Post With Even More...
Make Military Bases Great Again: Pete Hegseth Restores God-Given 2A Rights to Servicemembe...
Thanksgiving, Rockets, and Saving the World: Libs Meltdown Over American Greatness — Cry...
Houston Calls Good Friday the 'Spring Holiday Weekend' – Because Saying 'Easter' Is...
Rep. Ro Khanna's NOT Lying for a Change (About What'll Happen If the...
Jennifer Siebel Newsom’s Parenting Tips Include Dolls for Boys and Gender-Swapping Male Bo...

Prosecutors seek to drop Capitol riot case that was based on 'evidence' from a paid confidential informant

NBC News is reporting that federal prosecutors on Tuesday told a judge they intend to drop a case against Christopher Kelly, who was arrested January 20 in connection with the January 6 storming of the Capitol by Trump supporters. There are nearly 500 such cases pending, so the prosecution is off to a bad start.

Advertisement

Pete Williams reports:

The man, Christopher Kelly of New York City, was arrested Jan. 20 after the FBI said a paid confidential informant told agents that Kelly was posting material on a Facebook Messenger app about the riot and his plans to be in Washington on Jan. 6. The informant said a photo taken inside the Capitol was also posted, according to the FBI.

In the charging documents filed in court, an FBI agent said, “I believe the messages and image … reflect that Chris Kelly was using this account to inform associates that he had breached the Capitol and was inside.”

The court document accompanying the charges included photos that the FBI said showed Kelly on the Capitol grounds, but they did not include any further indication that he entered the building.

Other riot cases have included data from cellphone service providers indicating that defendants’ phones were inside the building. This case did not. Nor did it include any photos of Kelly himself inside the Capitol or offer any direct proof that he was among the rioters.

Can they get their deposit back from the informant?

Advertisement

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement