There’s a controversial voter ID law in North Dakota, and the New York Times reports that the voters have spoken:
Galvanized by a voter ID law, Native Americans turned out in record numbers in North Dakota — and a Native American woman unseated the law's architect https://t.co/O6gZq5Jbm0
— NYT Politics (@nytpolitics) November 14, 2018
For many, there’s a Democrat talking point in that headline that got shredded:
So clearly the Voter ID law wasn't suppressing their vote.
— Sgt. K. Onyx (@SgtKOnyx) November 14, 2018
So Voter ID did not "suppress the vote" in North Dakota. Thank you. https://t.co/m8HI1dtJTW
— Sister Toldjah ? (@sistertoldjah) November 14, 2018
Yes, thanks a lot, NY Times!
So it did not suppress voting https://t.co/sxLW4S3wgN
— Kurt Schlichter (@KurtSchlichter) November 14, 2018
I thought voter ID laws suppressed votes… https://t.co/zJYZ7eNioi
— Doctor ?? (@drhampel1) November 14, 2018
So Voter ID laws didn't suppress their votes? The media coverage was a lie and it worked for the Democrats? Shocker. https://t.co/hkBMAw4knZ
— Dale Jackson (@TheDaleJackson) November 14, 2018
Wait, so they voted to overturn a Voter ID law they believed suppressed their vote and won? ? https://t.co/qWtRlErHwP
— Chad Felix Greene (@chadfelixg) November 14, 2018
Recommended
But guess what point won’t be taken…
They'll never learn that lesson from that data.
— Pradheep J. Shanker, M.D., M.S. (@Neoavatara) November 14, 2018
Was not mentioned once in the article.
— Sister Toldjah ? (@sistertoldjah) November 14, 2018
And call attention to a Democrat talking point that got shot down in the same story? Never!
Join the conversation as a VIP Member