The anti-Trump celebrity lefties have spent Trump's second term proving that the president is a "King" and a "fascist" by holding events that nobody tries to stop.
Such is the case with Bruce Springsteen:
RECORD SCRATCH: Bruce Springsteen used his concert in Minneapolis to deliver a blunt message about America, leading critics to label the musician a "traitor."
— Fox News (@FoxNews) April 2, 2026
Springsteen called America a "predatory rogue nation" under President Trump, sparking social media backlash from users… pic.twitter.com/I864sq7Dl6
Stunning and brave.
But TIME Mag's review tries to make it the musical equivalent of the Berlin Wall coming down. This is quite the take:
Historians may remember the performance as one of the most unflinching acts of musical and theatrical resistance mounted against Trump—or any President, for that matter—in the nation’s history https://t.co/7Mlt14MvUG
— TIME (@TIME) April 2, 2026
First of all, nobody is trying to stop Springsteen from doing this so what exactly is he “resisting”? It’s a hissy fit because the Democrats lost an election. But TIME Mag sure does seem impressed.
That time when Time's Senior Correspondent boldly told the world that he failed history. https://t.co/URtcRH4FIw
— US Oil & Gas Association (@US_OGA) April 2, 2026
Recommended
The only "historians" who will remember this for more than a few weeks are the liberal ones who will attend the shows and then have their $500 tickets laminated.
>Bruce Springsteen does an anti-Trump concert for the 100th time
— Scott Greer 6’2” IQ 187 (@ScottMGreer) April 2, 2026
BlueSky-programmed AI: https://t.co/g0hG6dzaWp
The only historic event occurring here is the absurd levels of AstroTurfing being done by the dying legacy media
— AK Kamara (@realakkamara) April 2, 2026
I have yet to hear the Springsteen protest song being played out in the wild...and I live 30 miles from Minneapolis 🤷🏿♂️ https://t.co/Y7SOk9AJax
How would that TIME headline be any different if Springsteen himself wrote it. And hey, maybe he did.
*****