NATO Ratio: Flubbed NYT Iran War Headline Creates Groundswell of Acronym Acrimony Online
Google Is Free: X BODIES Obama-Era Diplomat For Asking and (Wrongly) Answering His...
Biden Walks Through an Airport: Case Closed, He Was Never Senile, You Conspiracy...
Fenway Erupts in Boos: Healey & Wu Get a Brutal, Well-Deserved Reception on...
Don't Back a Florida Man (or Woman) Into a Corner—And Don't Commit Crime...
TIME Mag Review of Springsteen's HISTORIC 'Resistance' Concert Couldn't Possibly Be More O...
HuffPost's Attempt to Create a Good Friday Outrage Cycle About Pete Hegseth Is...
Ozempic (Allegedly) Gov. Celebrates National Walking Day While Chicago Mourns Teen Shot De...
Deportation? We Don't Do That: Illegals Squat for Decades, Their 'American' Kids Try...
DNC Stomps on Multiple Rakes in Rush to Slam Trump Over 'Affordable' Health...
Let's Check on How Many Network Evening Newscasts Mentioned the Fraud Arrests in...
Endorsed! Corrupt Clintonista Marc Elias Accidentally Makes the Best Case Ever for Harmeet...
Here's How CBS News Reported $4 Gas Under Biden vs. Trump
Vindman Outrage is the Ultimate Endorsement: Hegseth Rightly Boots Army Chief Gen. George
Newsom Press Office Follows Up 'President With a Brain' Post With Even More...

Well DUH! Former NYT editor actually admits the Leftist birdcage-liner has a 'financial incentive' to bash Trump

The next time a Leftist insists there is no bias in traditional media, especially the New York Times, you send them this article wherein a former editor for the rag admits trashing Trump makes them money.

Advertisement

Yeah, we already knew they were playing politics to make bank (we get it) but they should stop pretending to actually be reporters and admit they’re nothing more than bloggers.

Or DNC propaganda pushers.

From Fox News:

A former executive editor of the New York Times says the paper’s news pages, the home of its straight-news coverage, have become “unmistakably anti-Trump.”

Jill Abramson, the veteran journalist who led the newspaper from 2011 to 2014, says the Times has a financial incentive to bash the president and that the imbalance is helping to erode its credibility.

Here’s where it gets juicy:

What’s more, she says, citing legendary 20th century publisher Adolph Ochs, “the more anti-Trump the Times was perceived to be, the more it was mistrusted for being biased. Ochs’s vow to cover the news without fear or favor sounded like an impossible promise in such a polarized environment.”

Abramson describes a generational split at the Times, with younger staffers, many of them in digital jobs, favoring an unrestrained assault on the presidency. “The more ‘woke’ staff thought that urgent times called for urgent measures; the dangers of Trump’s presidency obviated the old standards,” she writes.

Advertisement

More woke staff at the NYT.

Alrighty then.

Heh.

HA HA HA HA HA HA.

Wow.

That spin actually made this editor dizzy.

Bingo.


Related:

Gonna leave a MARK! Greg Gutfeld just handed Kathy Griffin the smackdown to end ALL smackdowns and ROFL

WTF is THIS?! HuffPost shares video of all-male cheering squad ‘redefining masculinity’ and OMG we can’t stop laughing (watch)

Isn’t she ADORBS?! Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez lists her accomplishments SO FAR, gets all tough with her critics and LOL

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos