Don't Back a Florida Man (or Woman) Into a Corner—And Don't Commit Crime...
TIME Mag Review of Springsteen's HISTORIC 'Resistance' Concert Couldn't Possibly Be More O...
HuffPost's Attempt to Create a Good Friday Outrage Cycle About Pete Hegseth Is...
Ozempic (Allegedly) Gov. Celebrates National Walking Day While Chicago Mourns Teen Shot De...
Deportation? We Don't Do That: Illegals Squat for Decades, Their 'American' Kids Try...
DNC Stomps on Multiple Rakes in Rush to Slam Trump Over 'Affordable' Health...
Let's Check on How Many Network Evening Newscasts Mentioned the Fraud Arrests in...
Endorsed! Corrupt Clintonista Marc Elias Accidentally Makes the Best Case Ever for Harmeet...
Here's How CBS News Reported $4 Gas Under Biden vs. Trump
Vindman Outrage is the Ultimate Endorsement: Hegseth Rightly Boots Army Chief Gen. George
Newsom Press Office Follows Up 'President With a Brain' Post With Even More...
Make Military Bases Great Again: Pete Hegseth Restores God-Given 2A Rights to Servicemembe...
Thanksgiving, Rockets, and Saving the World: Libs Meltdown Over American Greatness — Cry...
Houston Calls Good Friday the 'Spring Holiday Weekend' – Because Saying 'Easter' Is...
Rep. Ro Khanna's NOT Lying for a Change (About What'll Happen If the...

WaPo's Margaret Sullivan needed a 'study' to tell her why so many Americans hate the media, and she *still* doesn't get it

It’s the media’s job to know what’s going on. And yet, when it comes to understanding why so many people can’t stand them, they always seem to be the last to know.

Advertisement

If only WaPo’s Margaret Sullivan is any indication, journalists need a study to tell them they suck. And even then, they still don’t really get it:

Put on your shocked faces:

But, according to some major new research released today, these values [oversight, transparency, factuality, spotlighting wrongdoing, and giving a voice to the voiceless] can be a turnoff for the general public. And it suggests that journalists who want to reach the broadest audience and have the greatest impact should consider changing how they think about and present their work.

Advertisement

Hey, here’s a suggestion: journalists could actually try practicing what they preach. So crazy, it just might work!

But that would require introspection, of course, and journalists like Margaret Sullivan can never get very deep below the surface.

Sullivan concludes:

This research, troubling as it is, offers journalists the chance to think differently. Given the depth of our trust problem, we would do well to take that opportunity.

Well, given that Sullivan has basically just squandered a golden opportunity to take responsibility for her own role in fueling public distrust of the media, we won’t hold our breath for her to take the opportunity to “think differently.”

Advertisement

Gives journalists something to do, since they’re not really all that interested in actual journalism.

https://twitter.com/JimmyDHart1/status/1382294982820827148

Advertisement

Exactly. Journalists have done this to themselves.

Case in point:

Of course.

Oh, Jake Tapper absolutely believes he exemplifies those values.

Which is why if the media are hoping for the public to embrace them, they’re going to be waiting a long, long time. Maybe forever.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement