NATO Ratio: Flubbed NYT Iran War Headline Creates Groundswell of Acronym Acrimony Online
Google Is Free: X BODIES Obama-Era Diplomat For Asking and (Wrongly) Answering His...
Biden Walks Through an Airport: Case Closed, He Was Never Senile, You Conspiracy...
Fenway Erupts in Boos: Healey & Wu Get a Brutal, Well-Deserved Reception on...
Don't Back a Florida Man (or Woman) Into a Corner—And Don't Commit Crime...
TIME Mag Review of Springsteen's HISTORIC 'Resistance' Concert Couldn't Possibly Be More O...
HuffPost's Attempt to Create a Good Friday Outrage Cycle About Pete Hegseth Is...
Ozempic (Allegedly) Gov. Celebrates National Walking Day While Chicago Mourns Teen Shot De...
Deportation? We Don't Do That: Illegals Squat for Decades, Their 'American' Kids Try...
DNC Stomps on Multiple Rakes in Rush to Slam Trump Over 'Affordable' Health...
Let's Check on How Many Network Evening Newscasts Mentioned the Fraud Arrests in...
Endorsed! Corrupt Clintonista Marc Elias Accidentally Makes the Best Case Ever for Harmeet...
Here's How CBS News Reported $4 Gas Under Biden vs. Trump
Vindman Outrage is the Ultimate Endorsement: Hegseth Rightly Boots Army Chief Gen. George
Newsom Press Office Follows Up 'President With a Brain' Post With Even More...

New York Times runs 'quit Catholicism' ad, refuses to run 'quit Islam' equivalent

Breitbart.com on Pamela Geller’s latest exposure of MSM and governmental double standards:

The New York Times has explained its double standard for running paid advertisements attacking different religions with concern for the safety of America’s soldiers.

After running the atheist organization Freedom From Religion’s ad telling readers “It’s time to consider quitting the Catholic Church,” Pamela Geller of the organization Stop Islamization of America created a parody ad stating “It’s time to quit Islam.” The Daily Caller reports:

According to a Mar. 13 letter sent by the Times to… Geller, the $39,000 anti-Islam ad was rejected because “the fallout from running this ad now could put U.S. troops and/or civilians in the [Afghan] region in danger.”

This is the same New York Times which published details of the Wikileaks documents leaked by Bradley Manning in 2010. The Times justified its decision to publish the details of the documents, stating that it removed information which could lead to the targeting of individual operatives:

The Times and the other news organizations agreed at the outset that we would not disclose — either in our articles or any of our online supplementary material — anything that was likely to put lives at risk or jeopardize military or antiterrorist operations. We have, for example, withheld any names of operatives in the field and informants cited in the reports.

But by publishing stories from these documents such as alleged murders of civilians, including a pregnant woman, the Times engaged in the same kind of general incitement against American troops the paper now cites in its rejection of Geller’s ad.

Advertisement

Read the whole thing.

The New York Times won’t print it because of its concern for US soldiers in harms way? They make us laugh.

Isn’t it time you quit the Times?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos